000 03607cam a2200529 a 4500
001 u159265
003 SIRSI
005 20240916205756.0
008 061117s2007 nyu b 001 0 eng
010 _a 2006938845
020 _a9780195328578
_q(cloth)
020 _a0195328574
_q(cloth)
020 _a9780195328585
_q(pbk.)
020 _a0195328582
_q(pbk.)
035 _a(OCoLC)145732623
_z(OCoLC)144225278
_z(OCoLC)144225279
050 0 0 _aKF4552
_b.B366 2007
055 4 _aKF4552
_bB37
082 0 4 _a342.73
_222
092 _a342.73
_bB234c
100 1 _aBarber, Sotirios A.
245 1 0 _aConstitutional interpretation :
_bthe basic questions /
_cSotirios A. Barber and James E. Fleming.
260 _aNew York :
_bOxford University Press,
_c
300 _axvi, 201 pages ;
_c24 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _aThe presuppositions of constitutional interpretation -- The principal questions of constitutional interpretation -- The principal features of the American constitutional order : the positive constitutionalism of The federalist -- Approaches to constitutional interpretation -- Textualism and consensualism -- Narrow originalism/intentionalism -- Broad originalism -- Structuralism -- Doctrinalism and minimalism -- The philosophic approach -- Pragmatism -- Epilogue: a fusion of approaches to constitutional interpretation.
520 1 _a"What is the nature of the U.S. Constitution? How ought it to be interpreted? Ronald Dworkin famously argued that fidelity in interpreting the Constitution as written calls for a fusion of constitutional law and moral philosophy. Sotirios A. Barber and James E. Fleming take up that call, arguing for a philosophic approach to constitutional interpretation. In doing so, they systematically criticize competing approaches - textualism, consensualism, originalism, structuralism, doctrinalism, minimalism, and pragmatism - that aim and claim to avoid a philosophic approach. They show that none can responsibly avoid philosophic reflection and choice in interpreting the Constitution." "Offering both a succinct overview of approaches to constitutional interpretation and a powerful argument for a philosophic approach, Constitutional Interpretation will be discussed by constitutional scholars and students for years to come."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 _aConstitutional law
_zUnited States.
650 7 _aConstitutional law.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00875797
651 7 _aUnited States.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01204155
650 1 7 _aGrondwetten.
_2gtt
650 1 7 _aInterpretatie.
_2gtt
650 1 7 _aRechtsfilosofie.
_2gtt
651 7 _aVerenigde Staten.
_2gtt
650 7 _aVerfassungsauslegung
_2gnd
651 7 _aUSA.
_2swd
651 4 _aVerenigde Staten.
700 1 _aFleming, James E.
776 0 8 _iOnline version:
_aBarber, Sotirios A.
_tConstitutional interpretation.
_d
_w(OCoLC)607727341
776 0 8 _iOnline version:
_aBarber, Sotirios A.
_tConstitutional interpretation.
_d
_w(OCoLC)608486763
856 4 1 _3Table of contents
_uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0802/2006938845.html
856 4 2 _zAdditional Information at Google Books
_uhttp://books.google.com/books?isbn=9780195328578
856 4 1 _zTable of contents
_uhttp://proxy.library.carleton.ca/login?url=http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0802/2006938845.html
949 _cc.1
_lCIRCSTACKS
_tBOOK
_xPRINT
_p
999 _a342.73 B234C
_wDEWEY
_c5893
_i51994001572322
_f6/29/2023
_g2
_lCIRCSTACKS
_mLRC
_p$29.95
_rY
_sY
_tBOOK
_u11/22/2019
_xPRINT
_d5893